The Gospel at Christmas Time
A week or so ago a friend sent me an email about Best Buy’s decision to refrain from using the words “Merry Christmas” this year, preferring instead the apparently less-offensive “Happy Holidays” greeting. As Christians, my friend wondered, how should we respond? Send letters expressing our dissatisfaction to Best Buy, and send our shopping dollars elsewhere? Or do we simply need to learn to put up with such things in a post-Christian America? It’s a good question, but I think the answer is deeper than either of these alternatives.
As America moves away from its allegedly Christian roots, Christians must learn to separate the truth we profess from the cultural trappings that have been associated with this truth. In the case of the “Merry Christmas” vs. “Happy Holidays” debate, we need to take a step back and consider what we are actually celebrating as we approach December 25th.
The clear and simple response here is that at Christmas we celebrate the Incarnation of Jesus Christ, the second person of the Trinity. The Westminster Confession summarizes the Incarnation thus:
The Son of God, the second Person in the Trinity, being very and eternal God, of one substance, and equal with the Father, did, when the fullness of time was come, take upon him man’s nature, with all the essential properties and common infirmities thereof; yet without sin: being conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the Virgin Mary, of her substance. So that two whole, perfect, and distinct natures, the Godhead and the manhood, were inseparably joined together in one person, without conversion, composition, or confusion. Which person is very God and very man, yet one Christ, the only Mediator between God and man.
In these succinct, yet densely packed words, the message of Christmas is summarized: in Jesus, God become truly man, without ceasing to be God, in order to be the mediator between God and man. While this is true all year, around Christmas time we tend to focus our thoughts on the story of a particular baby born in Bethlehem about 2000 years ago. The Incarnation, however, is really only one chapter in a larger story; a story which climaxes several years later as this same baby, now a grown man, is executed for crimes he did not commit, and is raised from the dead three days later. In other words, our celebration of Christmas points us toward Easter, and is not really complete without this perspective. In any event, a Christian celebration of what we call “Christmas” entails the retelling of this great story in songs, sermons, and other liturgical acts, and encourages us to worship God in response.
Additionally, it has become traditional to gather with family and friends to rekindle emotional ties through eating, exchanging time-honored greetings and, in particular, the exchanging of gifts. And this, of course, is where Best Buy comes in.
Now, there is no obviously biblical reason to oppose the Best Buy part of Christmas, but it does seem abundantly clear that the Best Buy part of Christmas is not an integral part of the Christian celebration, and this should be born in mind as we consider the Christian response. Best Buy’s actions do not prevent, or in any way hinder, our worship of God this Incarnation season, so it would seem to me to be a bit shortsighted to withhold from them our dollars for this reason alone.
There is another angle to this issue, however. The decision of Best Buy and others to wish people “Happy Holidays” rather than “Merry Christmas” is seen by many Christians as the very sort of activity that is contributing to Christianity’s decreasing influence in society. Thus many Christians seem to take it as their duty to combat this trend by smugly responding to each “Happy Holidays” from a retail employee with an unequivocal “Merry Christmas!”
The logic of this behavior disappears almost as soon as it is articulated. The job of Christians is to bear witness to the gospel—at Christmas, and throughout the rest of the year. It is difficult to see how the cause of the gospel and the truth of the Incarnation is advanced by getting secular people to utter the sounds “mer-ee kris-muhs”. Would the country really be any different if retailers punctuated the exchange of goods with these words? Obviously not. And we do little to ingratiate ourselves to an unbelieving public by publicly complaining about their refusal to hold on to cultural expressions that we happen to like.
As I mentioned above, we celebrate Christmas in the shadow of Easter, an event that tells the story of strength through weakness and influence through self-sacrifice. With this in mind, I think it would be prudent to put thoughts of writing letters and organizing boycotts out of our minds, and focus our energy on how we have confused our culture’s Christmas traditions with the wonderful mystery of the Incarnation, when the Lord of the cosmos was born in poverty and obscurity in order to redeem his creation.
November 30th, 2006 at 1:31 am
Well written Bryce, thanks. It’s just so PC (the whole Happy Holidays thing) and that’s what annoys me, I agree with you though that t doesn’t hinder the gospel.
I don’t know if you remember but a couple of years ago some of the shops wanted to change the name of Hot Cross buns incase Muslims were offended, the Muslims merely shrugged and said they weren’t in the least bit bothered, the shops had not even asked them.
November 30th, 2006 at 8:51 am
Wow! Well thought out and written Bryce - Impressive! Once again you’ve impacted my thinking
November 30th, 2006 at 8:58 am
Cheers to this post.
Ken and I were actually just talking about this last Saturday on our long drive out to the Inland Empire. We were saying that we actually found it a bit more silly that so many artists pretend to be in to the “Christmas Story”, proclaiming “Go, Tell it on the Mountain”, etc. in their songs, when they don’t believe a word of it. Expanding this to the “Best Buy part” of Christmas, it’s silly to say that uttering the words “Merry Christmas” gives any credence to the gospel whatsoever from a non-believer.
In other talk of “sillyness”, what we felt was worst of all was that many of the people who were so opposed to the “Happy Holidays” greetings were also a part of those who spoke of cancelling church (or at least playing hooky) last Christmas, when it happened to fall on a Sunday.
December 1st, 2006 at 10:00 am
Good post. It seems that many Christians want the world around them to look or act Christian when we’ve been promised nothing of the sort. Not to mention that the Gospel is much deeper than simple phrases or having people behave in a fashion which is congruent with Christian morals.
BTW, saw your photos of Prague and Scotland and I have to confess a little jealousy. My wife and I spent a week in each in ‘98 and would love to go back at some point. But for now we just vicariously through others and old photos. Ah well….
December 6th, 2006 at 9:51 pm
I simply want to commend the beauty of this sentence: As I mentioned above, we celebrate Christmas in the shadow of Easter, an event that tells the story of strength through weakness and influence through self-sacrifice.
December 7th, 2006 at 8:19 am
Mr T thinks that is an excellent and well written post, truely a pleasure to read.
December 7th, 2006 at 9:51 am
What a great, great post. You get an “amen”.
December 7th, 2006 at 7:13 pm
Thanks, guys.
G, that’s a good point about the people who cancelled church last Christmas. I’ll have to think about that some more.
Mr. T, how’s the little one? Congradulations!
December 8th, 2006 at 2:35 am
The little one is now affectionately known as “tomaty-heid”, my own use of scots to describe her screaming tomato like head every time she gets herself all worked up!
She is absolutely perfect - I know all dads say that about thier little girls, but in my case it really is true!