I feel like it is almost pointless for me to respond to your comment, because your basic assumption is that all Christians should vote Republican. I don’t think that assumption is at all based on biblical reasoning, and so I don’t share it. (For the record, I think the appropriate thing for Christians to do in this election was to feel incredibly conflicted about voting for Bush…but since my absentee ballot just arrived today my opinion doesn’t make much difference now).
My comment on the election was very vague and certainly did not elicit the response you left. What I was intending to communicate was that this is a complicated matter. The number of Christians who simply assume that all Christians voted Bush is simply inexcusable.
First off, the argument that we should vote for Bush because he is a Christian is fundamentally flawed. It is not the responsibility of Christians to vote for Christians: it is the responsibility of Christians to vote for the candidate that will be most beneficial to Christians as they work towards fulfilling the Great Commission. It possible that a candidate would hold to a dispensational form of Christianity that would lead him to pursue certain policies in the Middle East in an effort to bring about Armageddon. Since dispensationalism is unbiblical, however, it would be the responsibility of Christians to vote against such a candidate. Along the same lines, it is not the responsibility of a Christian employer to hire Christians; some Christians, to the shame of all of us, are lazy and not good employees, particularly (it seems) when they know they work for a Christian. But the responsibility of the Christian employer is to run his business in such a way that it brings the most glory to God. Sometime hiring an unbeliever will produce a more beneficial result; and sometimes voting for a nonchristian is the more responsible option.
Secondly, when did I say anything about anyone being a liar or idiot? Of course it’s inappropriate to say such things about anyone, but why are you even bring it up now? On the other hand, however, just calling someone an idiot does not make that person unqualified for the presidency. Heck, I’ve called people idiots more than once or twice! I get the impression that you are just looking for an excuse to make Kerry (and democrats in general) look bad, and I don’t think that is acceptable. We often feel the temptation to make personal attacks on those with whom we disagree. This is not an appropriate Christian response, however. We can certainly disagree with people, but we are not to devalue their worth as a person, nor are we to exalt our own worth over theirs.
Thirdly, you say that Bush ‘will try to unite’ because he is a Christian. It really is not a simple as that. I hope this statement is not so obvious that it is insulting, but Christians don’t always do the right thing. We continue to sin, and so the fact that Bush is a Christian does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that he will try to unite. For one thing, his track record does not indicate that he will make an effort to bring unity. I know you will say that there were a number of nations that supported the U.S. in the Iraq war. While this is certainly true, the simple fact is that the U.S. did not have the support of the UN, and withdrew its motion rather than have it voted down. While the UN is not the infallible judge of international affairs, it is the recognized body for overseeing the type of war that the US undertook. The international perception is the Bush doesn’t care what anyone else thinks. Whether or not this is true is beside the point; it is what people think, and it must be addressed. Americans have the reputation for being ethnocentric, and it is not entirely unjustified. For another thing, I did not pin the blame for national and international division solely on Bush. Of course Kerry and other democrats are to blame, and so are other countries. This is not all Bush’s fault. But he is the President of the most powerful country in the world, and so he has both the responsibility and the ability to do a lot of things that others don’t. Do you want to sit around and point fingers, or do you think it might be better to actually do something positive? How many times as I was growing up did you tell me to be part of the solution, not the problem?
Fourthly, you say maybe my hope ‘ought to be that those who lost the election might try a little harder to understand the values of the nearly 60 million voters who supported the President’. There are so many problems with this statement that I don’t really know where to begin. Again, I’m not saying that Bush has the sole responsibility to make everything right. But he is the President; a little well displayed, sincere humility on his part would go a long way about now. The fact that nearly 60 million people voted for Bush does not make everyone else wrong. Nor does it make everyone else stupid. Of course you must realize that not everyone who voted for Bush did so for the same reason. I think the fact that Bush won the election says more about Kerry’s utter incompetence than it does about the nation’s support for Bush. It is utterly ridiculous to say that the nearly 60 million people who voted for Bush did so because of a shared set of values. I would suspect that a lot of people voted against Kerry, rather than for Bush. I also have serious problems with saying that because a large number of people did something, even it they all DID do it for the same reason, that it is obviously right. It’s simply not the case. Thousands of people see really bad movies every week. Tons of people drive really ugly cars. More people listen to music you can’t stand than listen to music you would own. And, most of all, millions of people are not Christians. In each of these cases I’m sure you would say, with varying degrees of certainty and seriousness, that the majority of people are in the wrong. Also, along the lines of your own statement, perhaps you should try to understand the values of the nearly 55 million people who voted for the loser. Many people voted for Kerry for very good reasons. I hope you can at least acknowledge that.
Again, I seriously doubt that what I have briefly said here has changed your opinion. However, my fundamental concern is to think Christianly about everything I encounter, and to try to help others do the same. I think it is unacceptable to equate evangelical Christianity with being a Republican. Being a Christian means being concerned for the poor; it means caring for the environment, God’s creation, with which we have been entrusted as stewards (and for which we will one day be called to account); it means pursuing peace; it means being completely honest about what we know and being able to admit it when the evidence in inconclusive; it means respecting human rights in EVERY situation. On some of these issues (and I said SOME, so don’t freak out) the Republican Party does not have a stellar record. The Democratic Party doesn’t have a great record on a number of issues that are important to Christians either. This is why voting is not a black and white issue. But in each instance we are called to evaluate the circumstances and make the decision that is most glorifying to God. Simple voting Republican on every issue is not the appropriate thing to do. God gave us intellects because he expects us to use them for his glory.